RESULT AND IMPACT INDICATORS
The project activities contributed to the outcomes related to the components “Sustainable Production” (1) and “Territorial Planning” (3) of the Fundo Amazônia Logical Framework.
The main indicators agreed upon for monitoring these objectives were:
Direct Outcome (1.1) - Sustainable forest and biodiversity-based productive activities identified and developed in the following Indigenous Lands (ILs): Kaxinawá of Rio Jordão; Kaxinawá of Baixo Jordão; Kaxinawá Seringal Independência; Kaxinawá/Ashaninka of Rio Breu; Igarapé do Caucho; Kaxinawá Praia do Carapanã; Kampa of Igarapé Primavera and Katukina/Kaxinawá.
Output Indicators
-
Area of Indigenous gardens and fields managed and/or enriched with agroforestry systems (hectares)
Target: 197,4 | Achieved: 287,22
-
Number of seedlings/seeds planted
Target: 10,000 | Achieved: 10,108
Outcome Indicators
Volume of raw production generated by the supported project, broken down by product (in tons or other units):
-
Açaí
Target: 5 tons | Achieved: 5,5 tons
-
Orange
Target: 0,5 ton | Achieved: 21,9 tons
-
Long banana
Target: 10 tons | Achieved: 38,6 tons
-
Buriti
Target: 1 ton | Achieved: 6 tons
-
Cupuaçu
Target: 1 ton | Achieved: 8,9 tons
-
Cassava (macaxeira)
Target: 10 tons | Achieved: 56 tons
Direct Outcome (1.3) - Expanded managerial and technical capacities for implementing sustainable forest and biodiversity-based economic activities in Indigenous Lands (ILs) in Acre.
Output Indicators
-
Number of training courses for Indigenous Agroforestry Agents (IAAs) conducted
Target: 27 | Achieved: 32
-
Number of IAAs trained in courses for the development of sustainable production activities, disaggregated by gender
Target: 79 | Achieved: 84
-
Number of Indigenous individuals trained by IAAs for the development of sustainable production activities, disaggregated by gender
Target: 340 | Achieved: 841 (including 293 women)
Outcome Indicators
- Number of Indigenous individuals trained for the development of sustainable production activities who are effectively applying the acquired knowledge, disaggregated by gender
Target: 275 | Achieved: 1,098 men and 522 women
These results reflect a higher number of advisory trips, training courses, and workshops than originally planned. They also highlight the project's focus on facilitating autonomous work by Indigenous consultant IAAs within their territories, who continuously visited villages to inform, plan, negotiate, and carry out activities with families.
Direct Outcome (3.2) - The Indigenous Lands of Kaxinawá of Rio Jordão, Kaxinawá of Baixo Jordão, Kaxinawá Seringal Independência, Kaxinawá/Ashaninka of Rio Breu, Igarapé do Caucho, Kaxinawá Praia do Carapanã, Kampa of Igarapé Primavera, and Katukina/Kaxinawá have strengthened infrastructure, territorial protection, and management.
Output Indicator
- Monitoring and surveillance reports submitted to competent oversight agencies
Target: 18 | Achieved: 6
The main challenge that negatively impacted this activity was the politically adverse environment toward Indigenous causes. Although meetings were held with relevant institutions, they did not result in concrete actions.
Output Indicator
- Number of territorial and environmental management workshops conducted
Target: 6 | Achieved: 6
Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, the strategy of organizing workshops within Indigenous Lands (ILs) exclusively by Indigenous facilitators enabled the achievement of the target. This was notably the case in the ILs of Igarapé do Caucho, Kaxinawá Praia do Carapanã, and Katukina/Kaxinawá.
- Number of Indigenous participants in the workshops, disaggregated by gender
Target: 180 | Achieved: 204 men and 75 women
- Number of participations by representatives from surrounding communities in coordination and engagement events
Target: 9 | Achieved: 197
The high number of participations by representatives from surrounding communities is due to the project's strong emphasis on coordination and training activities for integrated management with residents of neighboring areas (such as RESEX Alto Tarauacá and RESEX Alto Juruá). These efforts aimed to foster dialogue on shared challenges and threats, negotiate territorial protection and political advocacy agreements, and define strategies to improve food security.
Although the project originally planned actions in only four Indigenous Lands (ILs), six ILs ended up implementing territorial protection activities either with support from the project or through exclusive contributions from the villages themselves.
- Number of missions for meetings between Indigenous representatives and oversight agencies
Target: 12 | Achieved: 12
The meetings were successfully held; however, they did not result in effective actions from the oversight agencies.
Outcome Indicator
- Extent of protected areas with strengthened environmental management and/or improved territorial control (hectares)
Target: 260,523 | Achieved: 1,610,156
This result reflects the intensive training of Indigenous Agroforestry Agents (IAAs) through courses conducted in 22 Indigenous Lands over the past five years with support from the project. It also reflects the ongoing support these agents provide for territorial and environmental management activities in their villages, the expansion of poultry farming across all these ILs, and the strengthening of agroforestry plantations.
Institutional and administrative aspects
Among the established partnerships, the Special Indigenous Health District (DSEI)/Secretariat of Indigenous Health (SESAI) of the Ministry of Health and the National Foundation for Indigenous Peoples (Funai) stand out, along with an emergency collaborative action supported by the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), which coordinated donations of essential food items, distribution of food and fishing kits, hygiene and cleaning supplies, fuel, and equipment for access to potable water, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and extreme flooding events in 2021 and 2022. Partnerships were also established with PREVFOGO/Ibama and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for the training of Indigenous fire brigades, and with WWF Brazil for training Indigenous monitors and promoting the use of technologies for territorial protection—crucial for enhancing Indigenous protection teams’ capacity in preventing and combating wildfires and illegal resource extraction.
The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office has also played a key role in defending Indigenous rights, particularly regarding the impacts and irregularities of highway construction projects and in enforcing public policies such as the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) and the Food Acquisition Program (PAA).
Risks and lessons learned
The coronavirus pandemic required adaptive strategies, such as virtual meetings, internet installation in villages, information campaigns, emergency support, and the reconfiguration of courses and workshops to prevent infections. The partnership with DSEI – SESAI was essential for delivering emergency aid to the villages, as well as for strengthening activities related to local production structures, such as poultry farming, construction of chicken coops, fish farming, lake management, well renovations, among others, to enhance food security and income generation in the villages during a delicate period of social isolation.
Another adverse scenario was the flooding that occurred in early 2021 and 2022, which redirected a significant amount of the team’s time to emergency response actions, in addition to those already underway due to the pandemic. The affected communities had to focus on recovering crops, agroforestry plantations, animal husbandry, and rebuilding many homes that were destroyed by the floods.
Therefore, the continuous planning, negotiation, and execution of activities in close partnership with Indigenous associations and Indigenous consultants from the ILs was of utmost importance for implementing all activities in the territories, enabling results that exceeded those originally anticipated.
Sustainability of the results
It is important to emphasize the need to further intensify actions that Indigenous people themselves can carry out autonomously, such as monitoring plantations, conducting evaluations, updating and implementing community proposals and demands, maintaining activities led by highly experienced IAAs and Indigenous leaders who already have significant professional experience as Indigenous consultants. These individuals can facilitate mediation and advisory actions between Indigenous Lands, ensuring that activities are carried out in the villages with knowledge-sharing initiatives and attention to key aspects of food security.
Participants in the project’s closing seminar raised issues related to the scale and coverage of actions, replicability, expansion, duration, and sustainability. The activities developed aim to promote the implementation or consolidation of alternative and intercultural practices in environmental management, agroforestry production, animal husbandry, among others, serving as demonstrative models. These practices, due to their low financial and material requirements, prioritization of locally available inputs, and familiarity to the communities, are accessible and replicable, enabling learning and reconstruction. Another important action will be to encourage local production of seedlings and seeds and the exchange of these inputs between villages and territories, maximizing autonomy of access and the genetic flow of local varieties.
The mobilization of resources that make these practices and demonstrative models possible also allows for scaling up, expanding coverage to a larger number of families. In addition to what is implemented as demonstrative models in the Indigenous Lands, the agroforestry agents have the experience of what they developed and implemented at the Forest Peoples Training Center of CPI-Acre. Thus, local actions, in the medium and long term, help maintain and expand the positive results of this and other projects beyond their execution period, sustaining and disseminating the learnings and solutions.
Participants also emphasized that regardless of the various resources and interests that families may mobilize, two elements are essential: that local Indigenous associations are strengthened to expand partnerships and secure projects, which are fundamental for continuity and scaling; and that the actions serve to influence public policies. Therefore, the sustainability of continued results must be anchored in the acquisition and enhancement of skills that enable local actors, their collectives, and organizations to intensify coordination for greater technical and financial support, as well as knowledge and capacity for political advocacy.